Women planting rice seedlings in a paddy field in Nagaon district of India’s northeastern state of Assam. India, the world’s largest rice exporter banned the exports of non-basmati white rice on Jul. 20

Xinhua News Agency | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

India’s rice export ban could ripple across global rice markets — and millions are expected to be impacted, with Asian and African consumers set to bear the biggest brunt.

India, the world’s largest rice exporter, banned the exports of non-basmati white rice on Jul. 20, as the government sought to tame surging domestic food prices and “ensure adequate domestic availability at reasonable prices.”

The country accounts for more than 40% of the global rice trade.

“Malaysia appears to be the most vulnerable according to our analysis,” Barclays said in a recent report, highlighting the country’s sizable reliance on Indian rice.

The scale of people impacted by Indian rice ban will be in millions.

Mohanty Samarendu

Asia Regional Director at International Potato Center

“It imports a substantial portion of its rice supply, and India accounts for a relatively large share of its rice imports,” the analysts wrote. 

Singapore is likely to be affected as well, with the report showing that India makes up around 30% of the city state’s rice imports.

However, Barclays noted that Singapore is largely dependent on imports of food in general, not just rice. The country is currently in the midst of seeking exemptions from India’s ban.

Rice prices are currently hovering at decade highs, with El Nino putting further risks on global production in other major Asian rice producers such as Thailand, Pakistan and Vietnam.

Barclays pointed out that Philippines would be the “most exposed to a rise in global rice prices,” given how the weighting of rice is highest in the country’s CPI basket. However, a large bulk of the Southeast Asian nation’s rice imports comes from Vietnam.

Other affected regions

Workers in India’s Santipur creating long columns of rice before spreading the piles with their feet and rakes. India’s withdrawal of non-basmati white rice, comes on the heels of last September’s ban on shipments of broken rice.

Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

This is not India’s first time imposing an export ban on non-basmati rice, but the impact this time could be more far-reaching than before.

In October 2007, India imposed a ban on non-basmati exports, only to temporarily lift the ban and impose it again in April 2008, sending prices almost 30% higher to stand at the record high of $22.43 per hundredweight (cwt). 

Prices tripled in the span of six months, according to an agricultural research company, the International Potato Center (CIP). 

Samarendu Mohanty, Asian regional director at CIP, noted that India was not a major player in global exports of non-basmati rice back then, and the current ban has “a more far-reaching impact” than 16 years ago.

He added that the magnitude of the ban would depend on how other rice importers and exporters react.

‘Possible mayhem’ in markets?

India’s rice export ban is expected to ripple across global rice markets.

Xinhua News Agency | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

India’s inflation rose to 4.8% in June on the back of soaring food prices — still within the central bank’s inflation target of between 2% and 6%.

However, inflation “threatens to come in at 6.5% in July,” HSBC estimated in a report dated July 24.

HSBC economists cautioned that extreme weather events could further put a strain on crop output.

“If shipments fall, there could be global price implications, spilling over into wheat, which is a part-substitute,” the bank noted. The economists said cereal prices are already rising both domestically and globally, with the latter also affected by the Black Sea grain deal.

Wheat prices jumped after Russia withdrew from the Black Sea grain deal.

Under the agreement, Moscow agreed to allow Ukraine to continue to export grain in a bid to prevent a global food crisis following the war on Ukraine.

But the Kremlin pulled out of the deal in July, claiming promises made to Russia under the deal were not met.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *